Sohyun Park vs Eudice Wong Chong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 May at 01:35 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Park vs E. Wong Chong

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

HKG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Park 1 - 0 Chong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sohyun Park winning 2 and Eudice Wong Chong winning 0. The last match between Sohyun Park and Eudice Wong Chong was at the W35 Andong, 21-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Sohyun Park getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Park | 1 |
| Chong | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Andong(05-21-25)
S. Park vs E. W. Chong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $9,698 | Career Prize Money | $9,725 |
| 61.22% (221-140) | Career Total W/L | 56.41% (242-187) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 66.67% (4-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1-2) |
S. Park vs E. W. Chong Match Preview:
- On second serve success, Park and Chong have similar recent records, each winning around 40.6% of points. Who has the edge here? It's a toss-up with such close percentages.
- When returning the second serve, Chong has a slight advantage, claiming 50.6% of points compared to Park's 48.95%.
- For returns on the first serve, Park holds a slight edge, winning 35% of points against Chong's 33.55%.
- In terms of resilience under pressure, Park outperforms Chong, saving 49.25% of breakpoints as opposed to Chong's 45.86%.
- Over the past year, Park has a better match win percentage at 59.15%, whereas Chong stands at 52.27%.
- Analyzing surface preferences, Park excels on clay with a 64% win rate, whereas Chong performs best on hard courts, winning 58% of matches.
- When considering tournament levels, both players compete mainly in Challengers/ITF events >$10K, with Park winning slightly more matches (59.68%) compared to Chong (56.41%).
- Regarding the quality of opposition, Chong has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 347.98 compared to Park's 419.96.
- If a match reaches a deciding set, Chong has a slight edge, winning 50% versus Park's 47% of such sets.
- Looking at break point conversion, Chong is more efficient, converting 42.31% of opportunities, while Park converts 34.07%.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head analysis between Park and Chong highlights a few areas where each player shows strength, making for a competitive match. Chong's slight edge in return games, particularly when facing second serves, could be crucial in dictating the pace.
Chong also shows a better breakpoint conversion rate, suggesting that when opportunities arise, he's more likely to capitalize. Furthermore, his record against higher-ranked opponents may indicate a higher level of competitive experience.
However, Park's resilience under pressure, demonstrated by his superior record in saving breakpoints, may counterbalance this advantage. His overall winning percentage over the past year also indicates consistent performance.
Taking these factors into account, Chong's experience against stronger competition and his break point efficiency suggest that he has the slight edge going into this match, potentially making him the more likely winner.
Sohyun Park vs Eudice Wong Chong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Park vs E. W. Chong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:14:37 | Average Match Time | 1:14:37 |
| 40% (18/45) | 1st Serve % | 61% (23/38) |
| 78% (14/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 66% (25/38) | Return Points Win % | 38% (17/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Park Recent Matches Played
E. W. Chong Recent Matches Played

S. Park vs E. W. Chong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.22% (221/140) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.41% (242/187) |
| 57.42% (472/350) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.12% (554/451) |
| 53.35% (3938/3443) | Games Win/Loss | 51.69% (4792/4479) |
| 60.00% (117/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.98% (207/150) |
| 64.23% (88/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 55.56% (15/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.72% (19/20) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 332 | Aces Total | 341 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 844 | Total Double Faults | 1110 |
| 1:36:1 | Average Match Time | 1:30:47 |
| 291.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.75 |
| 61% (13358/22002) | 1st Serve % | 66% (16417/24935) |
| 60% (7973/13358) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9821/16417) |
| 45% (3877/8644) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3855/8518) |
| 50% (1498/2984) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1612/3353) |
| 49% (10565/21736) | Return Points Win % | 47% (12154/25790) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Cups W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Main Tour W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 60.63% (154/100) | Challenger W/L | 57.63% (170/125) |
| 69.05% (58/26) | Futures W/L | 57.76% (67/49) |
| 61% (218/355) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (238/422) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 54% (32/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (50/83) |
| 70% (70/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (77/148) |
| 93% (202/187) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (232/194) |
| 7% (202/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (232/38) |
| 21% (159/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (197/48) |